Nov
29
2007
Wow
Lunarpages has an awesome contest going! Just design a WordPress theme, upload it, and you are entered!
Here are the prizes:
First Prize is $1,000 cash and 5 years free hosting on our Basic Plan
Second Prize is 3 years free hosting + $300 cash
Third Prize is 1 year free hosting + $100 cash
To learn more visit this
LP blog post!
Related Hosts
Share this :
Nov
29
2007
One of the most frequent concerns I hear from clients and non-clients alike, involves questions about the enforceability of different types of contracts, and contract negotiations. A
recent decision in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia reinforces the general trend that contracts negotiated electronically, and often signed that way as well, can be enforced. It also reinforces the point of law that e-mail communication is as authoritative as a letter.
This dispute involves a contract that was negotiated by e-mail. One of the negotiating parties suggested a change to the contract after the initial contract had been signed. One of these provisions, an arbitration clause, was the subject to the dispute. While the parties disagreed on the series of events, they did agree that the other party signed the initial contract, replied by e-mail to a proposed modification, and then signed the “new” contract. The e-mail reply stated: “[m]y answer is yes to both. Please make the necessary changes and additions and forward the same to me in two signed copies. I will then sign them both and return one completed contract to you.”
The parties disputed whether there was actual agreement about the second version of the contract – even though it was fully executed. The court held that the response in the e-mail was sufficient to demonstrate that the parties agreed to the new terms, even if one party had not actually read the agreement, or misunderstood what he was agreeing to.
This case is important for two reasons. The first is to further strengthen the current trend of allowing contract consent by e-mail (and, by extrapolation, other electronic means). The second is to point out that in spite of its informal nature, e-mail will likely be considered by a court to have the same evidentiary status as a letter or other formal method of communication. It bears repeating that communication by e-mail should be treated with the same care as communication by letter or fax.
Nov
29
2007
Recently I wrote a blog about Firedog and the Geek Squad. I need to put this subject to bed so I can get on with better things. But I did learn something.
First - promotion wise Circuit City (Firedog) is way ahead of Best Buy (Geek Squad) in advertizing and promoting the service. After visiting both, the in store emphasis reflects the ad space. Firedog is way ahead, "it has it all" - I love that line.
Going to both stores was problematic - in the spirit of providing the best info for these blogs, my wallet eventually came out. All three stores got into my pocket. Did I say 3? Yes, CompUSA actually got most my cash and even haggled several hundred dollars less than BB & CC. Highly recommended for hagglers - as I now struggle with 120hrz.
Now price points for a flat screen TV installation/theatre co-ordination (Oh yes CompUSA has TECHPRO, which by the way, reminds me of Chuck and his buddy Morgan).
- Geek Squad - Figure $500
- Circuit City - Around $450
I opted for spending Thanksgiving weekend learning about and installing my new toys (Which can only be described as a custom job) and figuring out why Best Buy does not push the Geek Squad.
Why isn't the Geek Squad pushed by Best Buy? Best Buy is in it to make money. At $500 a pop it is just too labor intensive. Magnolia - a humbling experience.
========== MORE ABOUT TOM ==========
New Commerce Communications
E-Mail Tom Direct
